Something is “controllable/uncontrollable” in False dichotomy. Actually, it’s “cost to control higher/lower.”
All human decisions are not physical restraints and therefore “can be changed.” - policy constraint / Rules are a product of past negotiations.
On the other hand, compared to “bird in hand”, the cost of changing decision and acquiring a new bird is higher
So, you ignore the high-cost ones and use the low-cost ones that are available now, is that right?
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/「コントロールできる/できない」は誤った二分法 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I’m very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.